South Oxhey Radio Taxis Proposes 20p Fare Increase: Council Objects And Wants 3 Years Fare Freeze
Taxi of Tomorrow preview: Nissan NV200 hits New York City streets ahead of scheduled fall debut
Lest We Forget
Court Ruling Allows New Taxi and Car Services To Be Street Hailed In Outer Boroughs of New York.
New York yesterday:
A court of appeal has thrown out the lawsuit, a last minuet injunction that stopped the use of hailing apps by limousine car services and Taxicabs opening the doors to Uber.
More importantly, Mayor Bloomberg has backed up his threat to "destroy" their "fucking industry" by winning a court ruling which will now allow people in outer boroughs to hail new Taxi and car services without pre booking, changing laws that have stood for many years.
This article from the Verge :
A New York City court ruled today that people can use smartphone apps to digitally hail taxicabs, clearing the way for a new pilot program set to launch soon. The ruling is a move forward for proponents of the technological advance, and for the New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission (TLC), which adopted the measure in December. Several car services and the Livery Roundtable (a union which represents nearly 20,000 livery drivers) sued the TLC in February, arguing that the program would violate city codes, and that discrimination based on location, age, and race, could ensue. The court threw out that lawsuit today, following a last-minute injunction against taxi-hailing apps in early May.
In New York City, taxicabs can only be hailed in person, while car services can be arranged in advance. This has caused contentious debates surrounding services such as Uber, which, in other cities, make possible the hailing of both black car services and the less costly taxicabs.
To further complicate matters, car service (i.e., non-medallion cars) hailing is only legal within the confines of Manhattan, with the outer boroughs (where cabs are fewer) served primarily by livery services available using smartphone applications and call-ahead services. Mayor Michael Bloomberg's administration, however, today won a ruling in Albany which would allow people in the outer boroughs to hail car service cars without pre-arrangement, changing the longstanding laws against the practice. Bloomberg's relationship with the TLC has been extremely strained, with the New York Post reporting that the mayor vowed to "destroy" their "fucking industry" in late May when asked about his plan to replace all taxicabs with the fuel efficient Nissan NV200, a measure which the TLC opposes.
Once instituted, the pilot program allowing smartphone hailing will be available to all New York City cab drivers, though participation will be optional. In a statement to Bloomberg, Mayor Bloomberg said, "In New York City in 2013, common sense and the free market say that you should be able to use your smartphone to get a cab, and that’s why we created a pilot program to allow users to do just that."
This from the Wall Street Journal:
The state Court of Appeals unanimously upheld Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s plan to allow a new class of taxi service in boroughs outside Manhattan, reversing a lower court that said the mayor had skirted City Council opposition by going to the state legislature instead.
The ruling is a major victory for Mr. Bloomberg on one of his signature efforts to reform the way New York City’s taxis, liveries, black cars and limousines operate.
In this case, Mr. Bloomberg and Taxi and Limousine Commission Chairman David Yassky have said they want to allow up to 18,000 livery cars to begin offering street-hail service in areas that are under-served by the existing city fleet of 13,000 yellow cabs, which do virtually all of their business at the city airports and in Manhattan’s business and nightlife districts.
But a state court judge in Manhattan declared the so-called “boro taxi” plan unconstitutional in 2012, deciding that Mr. Bloomberg had violated the Home Rule provision of the state Constitution, among other provisions. The state law was an end-run around the City Council, which had traditionally set the city’s taxi rules, Justice Arthur Engoron ruled.
The court of appeals unanimously overruled that reading in the decision released Thursday, saying that the taxi law addressed “a matter of substantial State concern,” which justifies the legislature’s role in passing the plan.
Angry mob's outrage at Cambridge taxi driver after pensioner injured
London Taxi Company Taking On New Staff At Coventry Site
Workers who lost their jobs at a Coventry-based taxi maker are being given the chance to apply for about 30 new vacancies.
The London Taxi Company, formerly LTI, was sold to Chinese firm Geely in February after owners Manganese Bronze Holdings went into administration.
About 99 out of 176 jobs were lost after the move into administration.
The jobs are at the Holyhead Road site and Unions say 77 former workers are being sent letters about them.
Thirty-two new vacancies will be offered to about 77 ex-production team members, with a view to "low-level production" starting in mid-August.
Peter Johansen, vice president of The London Taxi Company, said: "We've already recruited 38 employees this year and we've got 58 in total that we're going to be taking on in the coming months [across the UK].
"Thirty -two of those will be in production in the Coventry factory in the next couple of months, so it's good news."
He said full production would hopefully begin by the end of September.
"We've sold over 200 new cabs in the UK in the last couple of weeks and we've got a five-week waiting list for a new cab," he said.
"Internationally it's going to be a record year for us because we've already taken orders for over 800 vehicles and there's many more orders pending."
Peter Coulson from the Unite Union said he is "quite optimistic" that there will be more jobs in the future.
He said: "In terms of the new jobs, they're totally new engagements, but they will be actually taken on to previous rates of pay and also the hours of work… so its's very, very good news."
Source BBC News
Green Tomato Cars....Taxi Fleet...My Arse.
BORIS LIES: IS IT ALL OVER FOR TIM YEO?
.
The latest Register of Members’ Interests shows that Yeo pocketed £40,000 for 91 hours work at Eco City last year, thats a generous £440-an-hour.
YEO EXPOSED BY SUNDAY TIMES....by Dave Davies
THE Tory MP in charge of scrutinising new energy laws has been caught boasting about how he can use his leadership of a powerful Commons committee to push his private business interests.
Tim Yeo told undercover reporters — posing as representatives of a firm offering to hire him — that he was close to “really all the key players in the UK in government” and could introduce them to “almost everyone you needed to get hold of in this country”.
He said he could not speak out for them publicly in the Commons because “people will say he’s saying this because of his commercial interest”. But he assured them: “What I say to people in private is another matter altogether.”
Yeo, chairman of the energy and climate change committee, was approached by reporters claiming to represent a green energy company.
However, the result is that there has been absolutely no reduction in pollution in London in 10 years. The Mayors own research has shown that 4267 people a year are dying from pollution and absolutely nothing g has been done to change that.
United Trade Group: Hear No Evil...See No Evil...
But what do we get from the LTDA, LCDC and Unite...the ones who engage with LTPH directly through the "engagement policy"?
Absolutely not one word.
Not one word in the Taxi Magerzine
Not one word in the Cab Trade News
Nothing in the Badge
Have they been ordered to remain silent?
Is this the price the UTG have to pay for membership of the engagement policy team?
Last week, news that in the last 6 months, LTPH/TfL/STC teams have only managed to revoke the licenses of 6 touts (these cases are subject to appeals and could amount to less).
One copper on a push bike could do better than that on a Monday night at just one location, Swallow Street.
We have also learned recently that Boris categorically lied to the GLA about NO2 emissions concerning new and older Taxis. The Defra report states that older cabs produce less NO2 than TX4 euro5 and Mercedes Vitos. In fact the highest emissions of NO2 come from Vitos 111 and 113.
Plus today news broke regarding Tim Yeo in the lobby Gate tapes (old news already posted on this blog but this time supported by undercover video)
As of yet, nothing from the UTG. Not one word...
One third of the licensed Taxi trade are paying subscriptions, to representative groups who appear to be gagged by the engagement policy.
CRB CHECK: Just when you thought it couldn't get any worse!
Russian app-based Minicab startup Wheely takes aim at London's Addison Lee : Everyone's Got An App:
Tim Yeo to step aside amid probe into committee coaching claim
Minicabs, Toothbrushes And Actors, Shocking Bill.
ZIG ZAG LINES: Is Picking Up A Passenger Defined In Law As Being Parked?.... By Jim Thomas
Part 5:Pedestrian crossings (191 to 199)
191
You MUST NOT PARK on a crossing or in the area covered by the zig-zag lines.
You MUST NOT OVERTAKE the moving vehicle nearest the crossing or the vehicle nearest the crossing which has stopped to give way to pedestrians.
Laws ZPPPCRGD regs 18, 20 & 24, RTRA sect 25(5) & TSRGD regs 10, 27 & 28
192
In queuing traffic, you should keep the crossing clear.
193
You should take extra care where the view of either side of the crossing is blocked by queuing traffic or incorrectly parked vehicles. Pedestrians may be crossing between stationary vehicles.
194
Allow pedestrians plenty of time to cross and do not harass them by revving your engine or edging forward.
195
Zebra crossings. As you approach a zebra crossing
- look out for pedestrians waiting to cross and be ready to slow down or stop to let them cross
- you MUST give way when a pedestrian has moved onto a crossing
- allow more time for stopping on wet or icy roads
- do not wave or use your horn to invite pedestrians across; this could be dangerous if another vehicle is approaching
- be aware of pedestrians approaching from the side of the crossing.
A zebra crossing with a central island is two separate crossings (see pictures in Crossings (18 to 30)).
Law ZPPPCRGD reg 25
I could be wrong, but i believe the DoT have failed to supply me with any proof of law or Highway Code rule/guideline that prohibits stoping to pick a passenger on Zig Zags and is unlawful or shows that picking up a passenger would render a vehicle as parked.
Rule 191 clearly states, you MUST NOT park on a crossing or in the area covered by the zig-zag lines.
You MUST NOT overtake the moving vehicle nearest the crossing or the vehicle nearest the crossing which has stopped to give way to pedestrians.
But there doesn't seem to be any section applicable to Zig Zags that states you must not stop to pick up or set down passengers, whether a Taxi or private vehicle.
Only been done once in 40 years for picking up on a zig zag, but I will no longer be paying this penalty in future, and will challenge all the way to the adjudicators.