Quantcast
Channel: Taxi Leaks
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4172

TfL, Accused Of Being In Bed With Uber. (There's a surprise...not)

$
0
0
Is TfL's House Of Cards Beginning To Fall Down?


Certain people in the media are begging to wake up and realise that Uber have been given a leg up by certain officers in high positions within TfL.

Let's look at the evidence.
• Licensed without a proper operating centre.
• Licensed without a land line for pre-bookings.
• App doesn't actually take pre-bookings.
• Vehicles using a "Taximeter"
• Drivers not require to have hire and reward insurance. 
• Customer accounts details not secure.
• Illegally plying for hire through smart phone app
• Taking instant hails
• No viable complaints help line
• Company refuses to deal with complaints against drivers.

This is just a few of the reasons Uber should never have been licensed in the first place, but they were!
Ex Director of LTPH John Mason, refuses to accept responsibility for their licensing. In a blog podcast interview he said:
"It wasn't my decision to licence Uber, we were under political pressure from above". 

Now we have this article in the Telegraph by Lauren Davidson, accusing Transport for London of being 'in bed' with Uber.

"TfL has been accused of "kowtowing to Uber" at the expense of London's struggling black taxi industry"

See full article here: >Click Here<

TfL have recently refused to include the new Maaxi app on its website, which currently features Kabbee, ComCab, Hailo and Get Taxi among several others. A letter was sent to Maaxi's CEO Mr Campos, hours before the apps release suggesting that he should “consider postponing the launch”. 

It's a shame TfL didn't consider postponing Uber's licence while they fully investigated implications of the apps legality.

In the letter, TfL new man Peter Blake, director of service operations for Surface Transport, warned Mr Campos that “there could be licensing implications for drivers working for Maaxi". 

It has also come to light that TfL have blocked Maaxi’s sponsorship of a rainbow-coloured Taxi that will be driven on behalf of TfL’s in the Pride parade in London. 

“It’s become very obvious that we are being bullied by TfL,” Mr Campos said, adding that Maaxi is not subject to TfL regulation but taxis and their drivers are. 

“It’s like a police officer stopping you when you’ve done nothing wrong, but you still have to stop and show your ID. We cannot operate this way.” 

Steve McNamara of the LTDA said:

“Maaxi wants to launch a perfectly legal sharing system that will bring taxi rides to a large swathe of Londoners who don’t use them ... and TfL is finding a reason why it can’t launch, it beggars belief. TfL have an agenda that certainly isn’t pro taxi and is kowtowing to Uber, the two are in bed together". Strong words from Steve. 

Leon Daniels, TfL’s managing director of Surface Transport, said, "We have not treated, and do not treat, Uber any differently to any other London operator."

Leon, would that be apart from:

Originally licensing them without a proper operating centre and without a landline. Letting them operate without actually taking pre bookings. Letting their vehicles illegally use a Taximeter that even the head of TfL Boris Johnson, agrees is a contravention of the PHV act 1998. Also letting drivers operate without hire and reward insurance.

Leon, you think this is not bias?
Well we suggest you think again!

Even though customer accounts have been hacked and customers defrauded out of vast sines of money, Uber still has no viable complaints help line.

No licensed Taxi operator would be able to start up or continue under these circumstances. It's time these top officers at TfL, who are bending over backwards to facilitate Uber, were bought to book over this seriously woeful and inadequate performance. 



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4172

Trending Articles